Saturday, November 25, 2006

Health Tip: Choosing a Supplement?

(HealthDay News) -- Because supplements are not regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as are prescription and over-the-counter medications, you should be careful when deciding what to buy.

Here are some guidelines on how to safely choose a supplement, courtesy of the Arthritis Foundation:
  • Continue taking any medications that have been prescribed by your doctor. Supplements are not designed to replace those prescription medications.
  • Always talk to your doctor before taking any supplement. There could be potentially harmful interactions between your prescriptions and a supplement.
  • Stick to supplements that are manufactured by established, recognized companies.
  • Check labels for the list of ingredients, and ask your doctor or pharmacist for help if any of the ingredients don't sound familiar.

Acupuncture, Turmeric May Help Ease Arthritis

(HealthDay News) -- Acupuncture and an extract of turmeric -- the spice that gives curry its kick -- may both offer significant pain relief to some arthritis patients, two new studies suggest.

Reporting in the November issue of Arthritis & Rheumatism, a German team says a combination of acupuncture and conventional medicine can boost quality of life for patients suffering from osteoarthritis.

And in a second study in the same issue, American researchers say the ingestion of a special turmeric extract could help prevent or curb both acute and chronic rheumatoid arthritis.
The findings should be heartening to the roughly 40 percent of arthritis patients in the United States who say they've turned to some form of alternative medicine.

"If I had arthritis, I would be very excited about this," said Dr. Janet L. Funk, the lead author of the turmeric study and an assistant professor of physiological sciences at the University of Arizona in Tucson.

According to the Arthritis Foundation, nearly one in five Americans (46 million) suffers from one of the more than 100 various joint diseases that constitute arthritis. An additional 23 million have chronic joint pain that has yet to be formally diagnosed.

Osteoarthritis is caused by a progressive degeneration of bone cartilage and is the most common type of arthritis in the United States. Rheumatoid arthritis is an immunological disorder characterized by a painful inflammation of the lining of the joints.

In her study, Funk built on earlier research she had conducted with rats. Those efforts suggested that turmeric might prevent joint inflammation.

In her current work, she first broke down the specific contents of commonly sold turmeric dietary supplements.

In the lab, she and her colleagues then isolated a turmeric extract that was free of essential oils and structurally similar to that found in commercial varieties. The extract was based largely on curcuminoids -- a compound they believed to be most protective against arthritic inflammation.

Funk's group administered the extract to female rats both before and after the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. They then tracked changes in the rodents' bone density and integrity.

The turmeric extract appeared to block inflammatory pathways associated with rheumatoid arthritis in rats at a particularly early point in the development of the disease. The extract had a beneficial impact if given three days after arthritis set in, but not if given eight days after disease onset.

Investigations in the laboratory revealed that turmeric stops a particular protein from launching an inflammatory "chain reaction" linked to swelling and pain. The expression of hundreds of genes normally involved in instigating bone destruction and swelling was also altered by the turmeric.

Funk stressed, however, that the findings are preliminary, and the extract needs to be tested in people.

"I feel an obligation to make clear that people should not run out to buy and consume turmeric powder," she cautioned. "First of all, a very small percent of the ground-up root that we buy in the grocery store is the protective part of the root, so it's not going to get you anywhere." In fact, the compound used in the study probably makes up only about 3 percent of the weight of current store-bought turmeric supplements, Funk said.

"That means that if this pans out in further studies, patients will be taking a purified extract, and this is all really exciting," she said. "But we still need conclusive proof that this extract is safe and efficacious."

In the second study, researchers led by Dr. Claudia M. Witt of Charite University Medical Center in Berlin spent three years tracking the treatment results of 3,500 male and female osteoarthritis patients suffering from either knee or hip pain.

For six months, all the participants were permitted to continue whatever conventional western medical treatments they had been undergoing prior to the onset of the treatment trials.

However, in addition, over 3,200 of the patients also received up to 15 sessions of needle-stimulation acupuncture during the first three months of the study. The remaining 310 patients received no acupuncture in the first three months. They were offered such treatment in the final three months of the study period, however.

All acupuncture sessions were administered by physicians who had received a minimum of 140 hours of certified training.

Symptom and pain questionnaires were completed at the onset of the study and at three months and six months of therapy.

Patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain who underwent a combination of routine medical care plus acupuncture demonstrated significant quality of life improvements, the researchers found. This included increased mobility and pain reduction above and beyond that experienced by patients who did not receive acupuncture.

For those who began their acupuncture treatments immediately, osteoarthritis improvement held steady three months after cessation of the sessions. For those patients who had begun acupuncture three months into the study period, comparable improvements occurred by the time they ended their sessions at the six-month mark.

The authors said acupuncture appeared to be a safe medical intervention with minor side effects observed in just over 5 percent of patients.

The study, one of the largest of its kind, demonstrated that acupuncture was a viable therapeutic option for people suffering from osteoarthritis, the German team said.

"I'm not surprised that people can be treated with acupuncture and get better," said Marshall H. Sager, a Bala Cynwyd, Pa.-based doctor of osteopathic medicine, acupuncturist, and past president of the American Academy of Medical Acupuncture.

"Using acupuncture adjunctively with western medicine is very common, because if you can do both approaches, you're way ahead of the game," he said. "Some people are not amenable to medication, either because of allergenic effects or because they just don't want to consume artificial things. And so, this is a way to start the healing process by engaging and stimulating the body's own inherent ability to heal itself."

However, Sager cautioned that American patients who consider this alternative route should choose carefully when they seek out acupuncture care.

" 'Medical acupuncture' is acupuncture as practiced by a physician, which is much different than acupuncture as practiced by non-physicians in the east, such as in China," he noted. "And I would most definitely recommend that patients in the west deal with a physician that's properly trained and a member of the American Academy of Medical Acupuncture," Sager said.

More information
Find out more about arthritis at the Arthritis Foundation.

Aromatherapy: The Scent of Dispute

(HealthDay News) -- Aromatherapy is an affordable, accessible natural path to relief for a variety of health problems, ranging from arthritis pain to nausea to drowsiness, supporters insist.

But skeptics dismiss any claims that the use of essential oils from flowers, herbs and trees can promote health in any way.

And both sides are unlikely to relinquish their positions anytime soon.

Aromatherapy "works for so many different things, it is amazing," said Kelly Holland Azzaro, a registered aromatherapist in Banner Elk, N.C., and vice president of the National Association for Holistic Aromatherapy (NAHA), an industry trade group. "You can experience aromatherapy by inhalation by putting one drop of an essential oil on a tissue and inhaling," she said.

According to the NAHA, aromatherapy is the "art and science of utilizing naturally extracted aromatic essences from plants to balance, harmonize and promote the health of body, mind and spirit." These essences are then distilled into "essential oils" -- highly concentrated aromatic extracts -- that are derived from a "variety of aromatic plant material, including grasses, leaves, flowers, needles and twigs, peels of fruit, wood and roots."

Among the most popular essential oils, which are widely sold at health-food stores and over the Internet, are eucalyptus, geranium, lavender, lemon, peppermint, rosemary, and tea tree, and according to the NAHA.

"Uplifting scents such as citrus can keep you awake at work," Azarro said. "To help increase alertness, use rosemary and lemon." And to combat nausea, try essence of peppermint, ginger and orange, she added.

While research into aromatherapy's benefits is limited, there are some studies that suggest certain treatments can help ease some symptoms.

For instance, in a 2005 study published in the journal Chronobiology International, researchers reported that lavender aromatherapy helped all 31 men and women feel more "vigor" the next morning, compared to the night they breathed in distilled water, an exercise that served as the control setting.

A study in the March-April 2006 issue of the Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health said that aromatherapy, combined with massage, helped new mothers feel less "blue" and anxious, compared to mothers of newborns who didn't get the treatment.

And a review published in Holistic Nurse Practitioner found that patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting can be helped by aromatherapy as well as acupressure and acupuncture.
But critics find little of value with scent therapy -- or even label it as therapy.

"It's not a therapy, it's a set of products with odors," said Dr. Stephen Barrett, board chairman of Quackwatch Inc., an Allentown, Pa.-based organization that says it fights health fraud and quackery.

"If people like the odors and want to pay for them, I would have no objection," Barrett said. However, he added, don't expect much. "There is no evidence that aromatherapy can alter the course of any disease. There is no logical reason to believe that any such evidence will ever be found," he said.

As for potential risks, Barrett said: "Some people find certain odors irritating. People who use aromatherapy with the hope that it will cure what ails them will waste money."

Azzaro said that, currently, aromatherapy is unregulated in the United States. "And that's part of the issue," she said. People don't understand exactly what it is, either. "People think it's potpourri or a smelly candle."

There's also no state licensing for aromatherapists in the United States. Most practitioners incorporate their training with another profession, such as licensed acupuncturist or registered nurse, according to the NAHA.

If you're interested in pursuing aromatherapy, Azzaro said it's best to ask a practitioner about his or her specific training. "And when you purchase oil, such as from a health-food store, hopefully some educational materials are with the product," she said.

Be aware, too, there can be the possibility of allergic reactions to some treatments.

More information
To learn more about aromatherapy, visit the National Association for Holistic Aromatherapy.

Anemone, Shrub Compounds Battle Rheumatoid Arthritis

(HealthDay News) -- Natural compounds from a sea anemone extract and from the rue shrub plant block autoimmune disease responses in both type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis, U.S. researchers report.

Scientists at the University of California, Irvine, conducted tests on rats and on blood samples from people with type 1 diabetes and on joint fluid from rheumatoid arthritis patients. They found that these compounds worked to deter the effects of destructive T-cells.

Both SL5 (from the sea anemone) and PAP-1 (from the rue shrub) block an ion channel in the T-cells, which prevents these cells from proliferating and producing chemicals called cytokines. These cytokines can attack healthy cells in people with autoimmune diseases.

The findings were published this week in the early online edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The researchers say it may be possible to use the compounds to develop new autoimmune disease treatments that target the destructive T-cells but still allow other white blood cells to fight disease and infection in the body.

"Autoimmune diseases affect millions of Americans, and any new therapies that can aid them will have great significance," researcher George Chandy of the university's School of Medicine, said in a prepared statement.

"What's promising about this study is that we identified a protein target on the T-cells that promotes autoimmune activity and the compounds that can selectively block the target and shut down the destructive cells," Chandy said.

He and his colleagues are currently conducting preclinical safety studies on PAP-1 and SL5 in collaboration with AIRMID, a San Francisco-area biotech company.

More information
The U.S. National Women's Health Information Center has more about autoimmune diseases.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Aleve Heart-Healthy Over Short-Term

(HealthDay News) -- Short-term use of Aleve, the over-the-counter version of the prescription painkiller naproxen, appears safe and even healthy for users' cardiovascular systems, a new company-funded study suggests.

Aleve falls into the category of drugs known as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which also includes analgesics such as aspirin, ibuprofen and cox-2 inhibitors such as Celebrex, Bextra and Vioxx. Bextra and Vioxx were pulled from the market after studies uncovered a significant rise in risk for cardiovascular events in people using cox-2s over the long term.

Use of Aleve -- at least over the short-term -- does not carry such risks, according to evidence from a small trial testing the drug's effects over a week of use. The trial was funded by Bayer, the maker of Aleve.

In fact, taking the medicine each day appears to reduce blood platelet activity in the same way that daily low-dose aspirin does, the study found. Accumulated platelets can build up in arteries, raising risks for heart attack or stroke.

"Patients come into my office and want something for pain," said lead investigator Dr. Michael Schiff, who treats patients at the Denver Arthritis Clinic and is also clinical professor of medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. "They want to know if the medicine I am going to give is going to have a cardiovascular risk."

"This data speaks to that issue," he continued. "Aleve will not be risky in that sense, and it could be cardio-protective."

The findings were presented Monday at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, in Washington, D.C.

Ever since Vioxx and Bextra were withdrawn from the market, the question of the cardiovascular effects of other NSAIDs has come to the forefront.

In their study, Schiff's team enrolled 41 healthy adult men and women who were randomized to either Aleve twice-daily (220 milligram pill twice/day), Aleve three times daily, prescription naproxen twice-daily (total dose 1,100 milligrams/day), or a placebo.

At the end of the seven days, each person waited at least six days before taking daily low-dose aspirin (81 milligrams) for another seven days, for comparison purposes.
The researchers then measured key blood and urine marker to detect signs of platelet inhibition.

They found that both doses of Aleve achieved an anti-platelet effect of 98 to 99 percent, similar to that achieved by the prescription form of the drug and low-dose aspirin.

"We know that the gastrointestinal side-effects of naproxen go down with a lower dosing," Schiff said. "So, this is good news for Aleve users who take a lower dose of the drug in its OTC form. They will get the same cardio-protective effects as with the prescription dose of the drug."

However, compared to the "gold-standard" of research -- a large, randomized clinical trial -- this study is rather small. "This was a laboratory study with small numbers relative to a large clinical trial," Schiff said. "But the blood-urine marker we used provided enough 'power' to the study to let us come to the conclusions we have reached. Further formal clinical studies will be needed to fully establish the cardio-protective implications of this study."

"The main point of the study is that OTC naproxen has similar anti-platelet effects as prescription-strength naproxen," added Dr. Arthur Kavanaugh, a rheumatology expert at the University of California, San Diego. He was not involved in the study.

"This is not surprising, but it is important because patients often think that OTC medications are less effective than their prescription counterparts," Kavanaugh said. "This study suggests that this is not the case for naproxen."

Prescription-strength naproxen has been available for over 30 years in the United States. The lower-strength version of the drug has been available without prescription since 1994.

More information
Find out more about NSAIDs at the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Sports Chest Protectors Don't Fully Protect Young Hearts

(HealthDay News) -- Commercial sports safety gear may not fully protect young athletes against sudden death caused by a blow to the chest, new research shows.

A blunt, non-penetrating blow to the chest can cause a potentially deadly irregular heartbeat called ventricular fibrillation. This kind of impact can occur during hard contact with another player in football or hockey, or when an athlete is hit by a baseball bat, hockey stick, puck, ball or other kind of projectile.

"The difference between a benign blow and commotio cordis is timing," study senior author Dr. Barry J. Maron, director of the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center at the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, said in a prepared statement. "If the blow occurs directly over the heart at a particular time in the heart's cycle, the results can be catastrophic."

For this study, Maron and his colleagues analyzed 182 cases of fatal chest blows recorded in the United States since 1995. Of those, 85 (47 percent) occurred during practice or competition in organized sports, and 53 percent occurred during recreational sports or normal household activities.

The findings were expected to be presented Monday at the annual meeting of the American Heart Association, in Chicago.

The researchers found that of the 85 cases involving competitive athletes, 33 (39 percent) of the victims were wearing "potentially protective equipment."

The athletes, average age 15, included 14 hockey players (two goalies), 10 football players, six lacrosse players (three goalies), and three baseball players (all catchers).

In 23 of those 33 cases, the players' protective padding was not covering the chest at the time of the blow. In 10 cases, projectiles directly struck the chest protector.

"These athletes wore standard, commercially available chest barriers, made of polymer foam covered by fabric or a hard shell, generally perceived to provide protection from the consequences of chest blows," Maron noted.

He suggested that there needs to be more attention given to chest protection for young athletes.

More information
The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about ventricular fibrillation.

Health Tip: Symptoms of Shingles

(HealthDay News) -- Shingles is a painful viral infection that strikes the body's nerve endings, affecting only people who had chicken pox when they were younger.

Shingles usually occurs in people who either have a compromised immune system or are 50 years or older. While there is no cure, your doctor may prescribe medication to help control the pain.

According to the Ohio State University Medical Center, you may have shingles if you've had chicken pox and have these symptoms:

Sensitive or painful skin, followed by a rash in that area.

Rash that lasts about five days as small red bumps, then turn to yellow blisters.

Upset stomach.

Fever.

Headache.

If you have these symptoms, see your doctor.

Health Tip: Got Hay Fever?

(HealthDay News) -- Hay fever causes allergy symptoms like itchy eyes and ears, runny nose, cough and sneezing.

The American Lung Association offers these suggestions on how to deal with these complaints:
When pollen counts are high, keep windows closed.

During the warm days of summer, run the air conditioning to limit the allergens coming into your home.

Use an air purifying device in the home.

If you have to work outdoors, wear a dust mask to avoid breathing in allergens.

Antihistamines or decongestants may help relieve symptoms.

Inhaled steroids or allergy shots may also reduce symptoms, but must be prescribed by a doctor.

Avoid using nasal sprays, as they can dry the nasal passages and eventually make allergy symptoms worse.

Sunday, November 12, 2006

Firefighters at High Risk for Cancer

(HealthDay News) -- Firefighters risk their lives each day as part of their job, but new research suggests they're at higher cancer risk, too.

In particular, researchers found that firefighters are more likely to develop testicular cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, prostate cancer and multiple myeloma compared with the general population.

Firefighters need to take precautions when fighting fires, the experts said -- especially if they have removed their protective gear and breathing apparatus.

That's because firefighters' exposures to carcinogenic toxins "occur not when they are in the fire, but when they are in the vicinity of the fire," explained lead researcher Dr. James Lockey, a professor of occupational, environmental and pulmonary medicine at the University of Cincinnati.

The report appears in the November issue of the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

In the study, Lockey's team collected data on 110,000 firefighters from 32 published studies that looked at the risk of 20 different cancers.

Firefighters are exposed to many carcinogens, including benzene, diesel engine exhaust, chloroform, soot, styrene and formaldehyde, Lockey pointed out. These chemicals can be inhaled or absorbed through the skin and exposure occurs both at the scene of a fire and in the firehouse, where fire trucks produce diesel exhaust.

Long-term exposure to cancer-causing agents increase cancer risk, Lockey said. "For testicular cancer there is a 100 percent increase in risk, for multiple myeloma there is a 50 percent increased risk, for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma it's a 50 percent increased risk, and for prostate cancer it's a 28 percent increased risk, compared with non-firefighters," he said.

"Overall we found 10 cancers that were either possible or probable that were related to firefighting," Lockey said.

He noted that fire crews use protective clothing and equipment to shield them from heat and chemicals when they are fighting the fire. However, when they take their protective equipment off they are at risk of inhaling cancer-causing chemicals and having these chemicals absorbed through the skin, he explained.

While firefighters are protected from heat and carbon monoxide, there needs to be consideration of how to protect them from long-term secondary exposure to cancer-causing chemicals, Lockey said.

"One thing that could be done is to make sure that firefighters take showers when they return to the firehouse," Lockey said.

One expert said that understanding how environmental toxins damage DNA and cause cancer is key to protecting people from exposure to harmful chemicals.

The findings are "not that surprising, because firefighters have complex exposures," said Roger W. Giese, the director of the environmental cancer research program at Northeastern University. "We know that the environment, including diet and lifestyle, causes 60 to 90 percent of all cancer," he said.

Giese admits that there is much that is not known about how environmental exposures trigger cancer. "In our research we measure the damage to people's DNA by the environment. DNA is the ultimate target for carcinogens in the body. So seeing which carcinogens reach the DNA is especially important information to have," he said.

Giese believes firefighters need better protection, but it's not yet clear what components or mixtures of chemicals are causing these cancers. "There is a need for firefighters to be better protected," he said. "And you have to know what the key mixtures that are causative are."
In addition, Giese noted that there's the question of individual susceptibility to cancer. "You can have two people with the same exposure, but their metabolism of chemicals can be different. Some people can have the wrong metabolism in the wrong environment and that combination really increases their risk for cancer," he said.

The effect of environmental exposure was brought home in a recent report that found that almost 70 percent of rescue personnel and workers who responded to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City suffered from lung problems during and after the recovery efforts. Some of those problems persisted for at least two-and-a-half years after the attacks.

More information
There's more on cancer's origins at the American Cancer Society.

Paxil Treats 'Compulsive Hoarding'

(HealthDay News) -- The antidepressant Paxil (paroxetine) is effective in treating people with a condition called compulsive hoarding syndrome, researchers report.

This syndrome has three main features: severe anxiety prevents patients from throwing out seemingly worthless items; they're prone to acquiring things, which sometimes leads them into buying sprees; and there's excessive clutter in their homes and work spaces, according to background information in a news release.

Indecisiveness, procrastination and disorganization are other symptoms of the syndrome.

Compulsive hoarding, which may affect up to 2 million people in the United States, is often found in patients with other diseases, including dementia, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia and anorexia. It's most often seen in patients with Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Researchers aren't certain whether compulsive hoarding is a subtype of OCD or a separate disorder.

The study, conducted by researchers at the University of California, San Diego, included 79 patients with OCD. Of those patients, 32 had compulsive hoarding syndrome.

The researchers found that both the hoarding and non-hoarding patients showed significant improvements in their symptoms when they were treated with Paxil, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI).

The findings suggest that further controlled trials of SSRI drug treatment for compulsive hoarding are warranted, the researchers said. The study was published in the Journal of Psychiatric Research.

More information
The Obsessive Compulsive Foundation has more about compulsive hoarding.

Study Debunks Rock Climbing-Arthritis Link

(HealthDay News) -- Rock climbing does not increase the risk of osteoarthritis in the hands and fingers, says a University of Tennessee study that challenges a previous theory.

The researchers compared 27 rock climbers and 35 non-climbers to determine if the long-term stress placed on the hand and finger bones of climbers caused changes associated with osteoarthritis.

The study also examined whether climbing intensity and frequency of different styles of climbing might influence changes in hand and finger bones.

"Radiographs of both hands were taken for each participant and were scored for radiographic signs of osteoarthritis using an atlas method," researcher Adam Sylvester, of the Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering at the university, said in a prepared statement.

"We compared 27 recreational rock climbers and 35 non-climbers for four measures of bone strength and dimensions and osteoarthritis. The results suggest that climbers are not at an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis compared with non-climbers," Sylvester said.

He continued: "Climber's finger and hand bones are, however, greater in cross-sectional area and total width, indicating that additional bone is being deposited on the external surface, not usually seen in adults. The strength of the finger and hand bones are correlated with styles of climbing that emphasize athletic difficulty. Significant predictors include the highest levels achieved in bouldering and sport climbing."

The study was published in the November issue of the Journal of Anatomy.

More information
The American Society for Surgery of the Hand has more about osteoarthritis of the hand.

Easing Depression Without a Prescription

(HealthDay News) -- A brisk run, a friendly game of chess, a soothing massage: All these pursuits can help ease mild depression, experts say.

"These are all things that are certainly worth trying and are generally healthy, anyway," said Dr. Nadia Marsh, an expert in treating depression and chief of the division of geriatrics at Cabrini Medical Center, in New York City.

Marsh stressed, however, that alternative or complementary therapies probably won't do much to ease really serious depression.

"For any form of mild depression, all of these things can help when added together," she said. "But, even then, it's not a form of treatment in and of itself."

Each year millions of Americans are diagnosed with depression, and many turn to their doctors for either professional psychotherapy or an antidepressant medication -- usually widely used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as Prozac or Zoloft.

But increasingly, people are also looking for non-pharmacologic relief of illness, including depression. Unfortunately, according to Marsh, the evidence to support the effectiveness of alternative therapies against the disease isn't strong.

"The studies for non-pharmacologic interventions have not been great," she said. "There are relatively few randomized controlled trials, and the ones that have been done are plagued by problems such as too-short follow-up or small sample size."

Still, some research has been encouraging. One study released about five years ago found that exercise could be a major weapon against depression.

"Exercise, at least when performed in a group setting, seems to be at least as effective as standard antidepressant medications in reducing symptoms in patients with major depression," said researcher James Blumenthal, a professor of medical psychology at Duke University.
His team's study found that 10 months of regular, moderate exercise reduced depressive symptoms at a rate equal to that of Zoloft.

Another study, this time by researchers at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, found that 30-minute workouts done three to five times a week could cut depressive symptoms in half in young adults.

Even less vigorous activities, such as T'ai chi or yoga, may help lower blood pressure and ease stress, Marsh said. "People who exercise also tend to feel that they have more control over their life," she added. That's important, since a persistent feeling of helplessness is a hallmark of depression.

According to Marsh, the science is much less clear when it comes to the effectiveness of supplements and herbal medicines. For example, there's little good data to support the use of either folate or the B vitamins in warding off the blues, she said.

Perhaps the most talked-about herbal therapy for depression is St. John's wort, but "the evidence that it can help moderate-to-severe depression is very poor," Marsh said. "Even for mild depression, it's unclear what the correct dose should be -- the studies have been all over the map."

Marsh also warned that both St. John's wort and prescription SSRIs get metabolized through the liver. "They both affect the liver, and it affects the metabolism of the antidepressant," she said.

"A lot of people combine antidepressants and alternative medicines -- we see that all the time," Marsh said. It's a dangerous mix, however, because adding St. John's wort to an antidepressant might boost the risk for side effects. The herbal can also trigger photosensitivity in users, causing their skin to quickly turn "beet-red" if they go out in the sun, she said.

"It shouldn't be given during chemotherapy, either, that can be very dangerous," Marsh added.
The bottom line, according to Marsh, is to always let your doctor know what over-the-counter medications -- herbal or otherwise -- you might be taking.

Finally, non-pharmacologic interventions such as massage therapy, acupuncture or aromatherapy are great at easing short-term stress, "but the real issue, when it comes to depression, is what is the effect over the long term?" Marsh said. Right now, nobody really knows, she said.

One thing the science does show, however, is that contact with others -- friends, family, clubs and group activities -- can boost mood and help ease depression.

"If you're socially isolated, especially, just reaching out can help," Marsh said. "It can have a huge impact on how people see themselves and help them to 're-orient.'"

Marsh stressed that most of the interventions listed above certainly won't hurt, and taken together, probably will help boost mood.

"They'll certainly improve your physical well-being and transiently, at least, your mental well-being, too," she said.

More information
Find out more about depression at the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

How Does Obesity Cause Diabetes?

Although it has been discovered that obesity plays a role in the onset of type 2 diabetes, scientists aren't certain how the excess weight triggers the disease.

What scientists do know is that obesity causes stress in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), a system of cell membranes found inside cells. This stress results in the suppression of the signals of insulin receptors, leading to insulin resistance. Insulin is a hormone that converts blood sugar to energy.

The ER has been compared to a synthetic machine of a cell, responsible for processing proteins and fats. Scientists have also referred to the ER as a factory for producing protein, as well as the site where excess blood fats are processed.

When the body is bombarded with nutrients the following occurs:
  • Nutrients must be processed, stored and utilized
  • The ER factory becomes overworked and starts sending SOS signals
  • SOS signals tell the cells to dampen their insulin receptors
    The ER restrains normal responses to insulin
  • Insulin can no longer clear sugar from the body

Another downfall of ER stress, besides obesity, is that it triggers inflammation in cells. This inflammation can be linked to heart disease.

Studies have revealed that if people can find a way to reduce ER stress, generate less ER stress or find a way for the body to handle stress more efficiently, type 2 diabetes might be easier to manage.

Science October 15, 2004;306(5695):425-6

Leptin: How Diabetes and Obesity Are Linked

Like two peas in a pod, the obesity and type 2 diabetes epidemics have joined forces in an attempt to ravage America's health ... and it's working, as hundreds of millions of people have been significantly affected by this deadly pair.

But how are these two epidemics intertwined?

Popular belief is that if one eats too much sugar, they'll get fat and develop diabetes; and, if they don't get diabetes it's merely because their body is producing enough insulin to keep up with the sugar. However, researchers have discovered evidence that there's more to the obesity-diabetes connection than this classic way of thinking: The missing link? Leptin.

Mice Studies Shed Light on the Subject
Research on mice has suggested that leptin is the key, as it regulates blood sugar through two different brain-body passageways:
  • One: Responsible for controlling appetite and fat storage
  • Two: Responsible for telling the liver what to do with its stored glucose

While it was previously found that disrupting the appetite-controlling passageway leads to obesity (which significantly increases the risk of diabetes), results of the study indicated that it likely takes disruptions in both of leptin's passageways to trigger full-blown diabetes.

Mice used in the study were genetically modified to disable what is known as the leptin-STAT3 cell-signaling passageway that leads from the brain to the body.

This s/s strain of mice was still able to produce leptin and the receptor it attaches to when sending STAT3 signals in the body.

Further, after eating too much and becoming obese, s/s mice did not develop diabetes; however, other strains of mice that did not produce leptin or have receptors became obese, developed diabetes and died.

Therefore, even when disrupting the leptin-STAT3 signal, the s/s mice were still able to keep their glucose under control, suggesting the likelihood of a brain-liver signaling passageway responsible for regulating blood sugar.

Cell Metabolism March 2005; Vol 1, 169-178 (Free Full-Text Article)
Newswise Mar 16, 2005

Cholesterol is NOT the Cause of Heart Disease

By Ron Rosedale, MD
Cholesterol is not the major culprit in heart disease or any disease. If it becomes oxidized it can irritate/inflame tissues in which it is lodged in, such as the endothelium (lining of the arteries). This would be one of numerous causes of chronic inflammation that can injure the lining of arteries. However, many good fats are easily oxidized such as omega-3 fatty acids, but it does not mean that you should avoid it at all costs.

Common sense would indicate that we should avoid the oxidation (rancidity) of cholesterol and fatty acids and not get rid of important life-giving molecules. Using the same conventional medical thinking that is being used for cholesterol would lead one to believe that doctors should reduce the risk of Alzheimer's disease by taking out everybody's brain.

In fact, cholesterol is being transported to tissues as part of an inflammatory response that is there to repair damage.

The fixation on cholesterol as a major cause of heart disease defies the last 15 years of science and deflects from real causes such as the damage (via glycation) that sugars such as glucose and fructose inflict on tissues, including the lining of arteries, causing chronic inflammation and resultant plaque.

Insulin & Leptin Resistance
Hundreds of excellent scientific articles have linked insulin resistance and more recently leptin resistance to cardiovascular disease much more strongly than cholesterol, and they are in fact at least partially responsible for cholesterol abnormalities. For instance, insulin and leptin resistance result in "small dense" LDL particles and a greater number of particles.

This is much more important than the total cholesterol number. Because of particle size shift to small and dense, the total LDL cholesterol could still be low even though the number of particles and the density of the particles is greater.

Small, dense LDL particles can squeeze between the cells lining the inside of the arteries, the "gap junction" of the endothelium, where they can get stuck and potentially oxidize, turn rancid, and cause inflammation of the lining of the arteries and plaque formation.

Importantly, many solid scientific studies have shown a mechanistic, causal effect of elevated insulin and leptin on heart and vascular disease, whereas almost all studies with cholesterol misleadingly only show an association. Association does not imply cause. For instance, something else may be causing lipid abnormalities such as elevated cholesterol and triglycerides, and also causing heart disease.

This "something else" is improper insulin and leptin signaling. Similarly, sugar does not cause diabetes; sugar is just listening to orders. Improper insulin and leptin signaling is the cause of diabetes. Likewise, cholesterol does not cause heart disease, but improper metabolic signals including improper signals to cholesterol (causing it to oxidize) and perhaps to the liver that manufactures the cholesterol, will cause heart and vascular disease and hypertension.

Removing cholesterol will do nothing to improve the underlying problems, the real roots of chronic disease, which will always have to do with improper communication, and the generals of metabolic communication are insulin and leptin.

They are really what must be treated to reverse heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, obesity, and to some extent aging itself.

Cholesterol; Wrongly Accused?
Before we can begin to talk about the real cause and effective treatment for heart and blood vessel disease, we must first look at what is known, or I should say what we think we know.

The first thing that comes to mind when one hears about heart disease is almost always cholesterol.

Cholesterol and heart disease has been almost synonymous for the last half-century.

Cholesterol has been portrayed as the Darth Vader to our arteries and our heart.

The latest recommendation given by a so-called panel of "experts" recommends that a person's cholesterol be as low as possible, in fact to a level so low they say it cannot be achieved by diet, exercise, or any known lifestyle modification.

Therefore, they say cholesterol-lowering drugs; particularly the so-called "statins" need to be given to anyone at high risk of heart disease.

Since heart disease is the number one killer in this country that would include most adults and even many children. The fact that this might add to the $26 billion in sales of statin drugs last year I'm sure played no role in their recommendations.

Or did it?
Expert Conflict of Interests
Major consumer groups think so. They found out that eight of the nine "experts" that made the recommendations were on the payroll of pharmaceutical companies that manufacture those drugs. Major scientific organizations have chastised medical journals for allowing the pharmaceutical industry to publish misleading results and half-truths.

There is a major push under way to force the pharmaceutical industry (and others) to publish results of all of their studies, and not just the ones that appear positive. The studies that showed negative results would be forced to be published also.

It could be that lowering cholesterol might not be as healthy as we are being told. More and more studies are coming out showing just how unhealthy lowering cholesterol might be, particularly by the use of statin drugs. In particular, statin drugs have been shown to be harmful to muscles causing considerable damage. A common symptom of this damage is muscular aches and pains that many patients experience on cholesterol-lowering drugs, however most do not realize that these drugs are to blame.

Hmm...isn't the heart a muscle?
Statin Drugs Actually Increase Heart Disease

Indeed, low cholesterol levels have been shown to worsen patients with congestive heart failure, a life-threatening condition where the heart becomes too weak to effectively pump blood. Statin drugs have been shown to also cause nerve damage and to greatly impair memory. One reason that statin drugs have these various serious side effects is that they work by inhibiting a vital enzyme that manufactures cholesterol in the liver.

However, the same enzyme is used to manufacture coenzyme Q10, which is a biochemical needed to transfer energy from food to our cells to be used for the work of staying alive and healthy.

Statin drugs are known to inhibit our very important production of coenzyme Q10.

Importantly, while many cardiologists insist that lowering cholesterol is correlated with a reduction in the risk of heart attacks; few can say that there is a reduction in the risk of mortality (death).

That has been much harder to show. In other words it has never been conclusively shown that lowering cholesterol saves lives. In fact, several large studies have shown that lowering cholesterol into the range currently recommended is correlated with an increased risk of dying, especially of cancer.

No Such Thing as Good and Bad Cholesterol

Because the correlation of total cholesterol with heart disease is so weak, many years ago a stronger correlation was sought. It was found that there is so-called "good cholesterol" called HDL, and that the so-called "bad cholesterol" was LDL. HDL stands for high-density lipoprotein, and LDL stands for low-density lipoprotein.

Notice please that LDL and HDL are lipoproteins -- fats combined with proteins. There is only one cholesterol. There is no such thing as a good or a bad cholesterol.

Cholesterol is just cholesterol. It combines with other fats and proteins to be carried through the bloodstream, since fat and our watery blood do not mix very well.

Fatty substances therefore must be shuttled to and from our tissues and cells using proteins. LDL and HDL are forms of proteins and are far from being just cholesterol. In fact we now know there are many types of these fat and protein particles.

LDL particles come in many sizes and large LDL particles are not a problem. Only the so-called small dense LDL particles can potentially be a problem, because they can squeeze through the lining of the arteries and if they oxidize, otherwise known as turning rancid, they can cause damage and inflammation.

Thus, you might say that there is "good LDL" and "bad LDL." Also, some HDL particles are better than others. Knowing just your total cholesterol tells you very little. Even knowing your LDL and HDL levels do not tell you very much.

A mistake that is rarely made in the hard-core sciences such as physics seems to be frequently made in medicine. This is confusing correlation with cause. There may be a weak correlation of elevated cholesterol with heart attacks, however this does not mean it is the cholesterol that caused the heart attack. Certainly gray hair is correlated with getting older;

however one could hardly say that the gray hair caused one to get old. Using hair dye to reduce the gray hair would not really make you any younger. Neither it appears would just lowering your cholesterol.

Perhaps something else is causing both the gray hair and aging. Even if elevated cholesterol were significant and heart disease (which I question) perhaps something else is causing the elevated cholesterol and also causing the heart disease.

Let's look little more at cholesterol or, as Paul Harvey was fond of saying, "the rest of the story." First and foremost, cholesterol is a vital component of every cell membrane on Earth. In other words, there is no life on Earth they can live without cholesterol. They will automatically tell you that, in of itself, it cannot be evil. In fact it is one of our best friends.

We would not be here without it. No wonder lowering cholesterol too much increases one's risk of dying. Cholesterol also is a precursor to all of the steroid hormones. You cannot make estrogen, testosterone, cortisone, and a host of other vital hormones without cholesterol.

Cholesterol Is The Hero, Not The Villain.

It was determined many years ago that the majority of cholesterol in your bloodstream comes from what your liver is manufacturing and distributing. The amount of cholesterol that one eats plays little role in determining your cholesterol levels.

It is also known that HDL shuttles cholesterol away from tissues, and away from your arteries, back to your liver. That is why HDL is called the "good cholesterol;" because it is supposedly taking cholesterol away from your arteries. But let's think about that.

Why does your liver make sure that you have plenty of cholesterol?
Why is HDL taking cholesterol back to your liver?
Why not take it right to your kidneys, or your intestines to get rid of it?

It is taking it back to your liver so that your liver can recycle it; put it back into other particles to be taken to tissues and cells that need it. Your body is trying to make and conserve the cholesterol for the precise reason that it is so important, indeed vital, for health.

One function of cholesterol is to keep your cell membranes from falling apart. As such, you might consider cholesterol your cells "superglue." It is a necessary ingredient in any sort of cellular repair. The coronary disease associated with heart attacks is now known to be caused from damage to the lining of those arteries. That damage causes inflammation. The coronary disease that causes heart attacks is now considered to be caused mostly from chronic inflammation.

What Is Inflammation?
Think of what happens if you were to cut your hand. Within a fraction of a second, chemicals are released by the damaged tissue to initiate the process known as inflammation. Inflammation will allow that little cut to heal, and indeed to keep you from dying.

The cut blood vessels constrict to keep you from bleeding too much. Blood becomes "thicker" so that it can clot. Cells and chemicals from the immune system are alerted to come to the area to keep intruders such as viruses and bacteria from invading the cut.

Other cells are told to multiply to repair the damage so that you can heal. When the repair is completed, you have lived to be careless another day, though you may have a small scar to show for your troubles.

We now know that similar events take place within the lining of our arteries. When damage occurs to the lining of our arteries (or even elsewhere) chemicals are released to initiate the process of inflammation. Arteries constrict, blood becomes more prone to clot, white blood cells are called to the area to gobble up damaged debris, and cells adjacent to those damaged are told to multiply. Ultimately, scars form, however inside our arteries we call it plaque. And the constriction of our arteries and the "thickening" of our blood further predisposes us to high blood pressure and heart attacks.

So Where Might Cholesterol Fit Into All Of This?

When damage is occurring and inflammation is being initiated, chemicals are being released so that that damage can be repaired. One could speculate that to replace damaged, old and worn-out cells the liver needs to be notified to either recycle or manufacture cholesterol since no cell, human or otherwise, can be made without it. In this case, cholesterol is being manufactured and distributed in your bloodstream to help you repair damaged tissue and in fact to keep you alive.
If excessive damage is occurring such that it is necessary to distribute extra cholesterol through the bloodstream, it would not seem very wise to merely lower the cholesterol and forget about why it is there in the first place. It would seem much smarter to reduce the extra need for the cholesterol -- the excessive damage that is occurring, the reason for the chronic inflammation.

So Why Take Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs?

The pharmaceutical companies thought that you might think that. They went back to the drawing board. They did more "research" and found (coincidentally) that statin drugs had anti-inflammatory effects. Therefore we're currently being told to stay on our cholesterol-lowering drugs because now they work by reducing inflammation and perhaps not even by reducing cholesterol, and in fact perhaps in spite of it. Aspirin reduces inflammation for a lot less money. So does vitamin E, and fish oil, and dietary changes without the dangers of drugs and having many other benefits instead.

What About Triglycerides?

Triglycerides are just medical terminology for fat. A person with high triglycerides has a lot of fat in the bloodstream. Triglycerides are generally measured when a person has fasted overnight. High fasting triglycerides are either from manufacturing too much, or using (burning) too little. In other words, what high triglycerides are telling you is that you are making too much fat and you are unable to burn it. This indeed is a major problem. The inability to burn fat underlies virtually all of the chronic diseases of aging, and in fact may contribute to the rate of aging itself.

As such, one might think that the control of fat burning and storage might be very important in heart disease, and the other diseases of aging such as diabetes, obesity, osteoporosis, and even cancer. Indeed, this appears to very much be the case. The two hormones that to a major extent control our ability to burn and store fat, insulin and leptin, appear to play a major role in all of the chronic diseases of aging. I would call them the most important hormones, indeed chemicals in the entire body. But that is a story for next time.

Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death

This article in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) is the best article I have ever seen written in the published literature documenting the tragedy of the traditional medical paradigm.

The author is Dr. Barbara Starfield of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health and she desribes how the US health care system may contribute to poor health.

ALL THESE ARE DEATHS PER YEAR:
12,000 -- unnecessary surgery
7,000 -- medication errors in hospitals
20,000 -- other errors in hospitals
80,000 -- infections in hospitals
106,000 -- non-error, negative effects of drugs
These total to 225,000 deaths per year from iatrogenic causes!!

What does the word iatrogenic mean?
This term is defined as induced in a patient by a physician's activity, manner, or therapy. Used especially of a complication of treatment.
Dr. Starfield offers several warnings in interpreting these numbers:
First, most of the data are derived from studies in hospitalized patients.

Second, these estimates are for deaths only and do not include negative effects that are associated with disability or discomfort.

Third, the estimates of death due to error are lower than those in the IOM report.
If the higher estimates are used, the deaths due to iatrogenic causes would range from 230,000 to 284,000. In any case, 225,000 deaths per year constitutes the third leading cause of death in the United States, after deaths from heart disease and cancer.

Even if these figures are overestimated, there is a wide margin between these numbers of deaths and the next leading cause of death (cerebrovascular disease).

Another analysis concluded that between 4% and 18% of consecutive patients experience negative effects in outpatient settings,with:
116 million extra physician visits
77 million extra prescriptions
17 million emergency department visits
8 million hospitalizations
3 million long-term admissions
199,000 additional deaths
$77 billion in extra costs

The high cost of the health care system is considered to be a deficit, but seems to be tolerated under the assumption that better health results from more expensive care.
However, evidence from a few studies indicates that as many as 20% to 30% of patients receive inappropriate care.

An estimated 44,000 to 98,000 among them die each year as a result of medical errors.
This might be tolerated if it resulted in better health, but does it? Of 13 countries in a recent comparison, the United States ranks an average of 12th (second from the bottom) for 16 available health indicators.

More specifically, the ranking of the US on several indicators was:
13th (last) for low-birth-weight percentages
13th for neonatal mortality and infant mortality overall
11th for postneonatal mortality
13th for years of potential life lost (excluding external causes)
11th for life expectancy at 1 year for females, 12th for males
10th for life expectancy at 15 years for females, 12th for males
10th for life expectancy at 40 years for females, 9th for males
7th for life expectancy at 65 years for females, 7th for males
3rd for life expectancy at 80 years for females, 3rd for males
10th for age-adjusted mortality

The poor performance of the US was recently confirmed by a World Health Organization study, which used different data and ranked the United States as 15th among 25 industrialized countries.

There is a perception that the American public "behaves badly" by smoking, drinking, and perpetrating violence." However the data does not support this assertion.

The proportion of females who smoke ranges from 14% in Japan to 41% in Denmark; in the United States, it is 24% (fifth best). For males, the range is from 26% in Sweden to 61% in Japan; it is 28% in the United States (third best).

The US ranks fifth best for alcoholic beverage consumption.

The US has relatively low consumption of animal fats (fifth lowest in men aged 55-64 years in 20 industrialized countries) and the third lowest mean cholesterol concentrations among men aged 50 to 70 years among 13 industrialized countries.

These estimates of death due to error are lower than those in a recent Institutes of Medicine report, and if the higher estimates are used, the deaths due to iatrogenic causes would range from 230,000 to 284,000.

Even at the lower estimate of 225,000 deaths per year, this constitutes the third leading cause of death in the US, following heart disease and cancer.

Lack of technology is certainly not a contributing factor to the US's low ranking.

Among 29 countries, the United States is second only to Japan in the availability of magnetic resonance imaging units and computed tomography scanners per million population. 17
Japan, however, ranks highest on health, whereas the US ranks among the lowest.

It is possible that the high use of technology in Japan is limited to diagnostic technology not matched by high rates of treatment, whereas in the US, high use of diagnostic technology may be linked to more treatment.

Supporting this possibility are data showing that the number of employees per bed (full-time equivalents) in the United States is highest among the countries ranked, whereas they are very low in Japan, far lower than can be accounted for by the common practice of having family members rather than hospital staff provide the amenities of hospital care.

Journal American Medical Association July 26, 2000;284(4):483-5

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Using Drugs Causes 700,000 in U.S. to go to ER Every Year

A study tracked adverse drug events reported at 63 U.S. hospitals between 2004 and 2005. During the study period, the hospitals reported nearly 21,300 emergency department visits.
Extrapolating to the United States as a whole, that means more than 700,000 people, especially those 65 and older, visit U.S. emergency rooms each year as a result of adverse drug reactions.
Seniors were seven times more likely than younger patients to be admitted to a hospital for this reason, and more than twice as likely to be treated in the emergency room.

Drugs, for the purposes of the study, included prescription drugs, over-the-counter drugs, vaccines, vitamins, dietary supplements, and herbal products. Adverse effects included allergic reactions, side effects, accidental overdoses, or secondary effects such as falls or choking.
Most adverse drug events were due to accidental overdoses and allergic reactions. Drug-related deaths, suicide attempts, abuse, and withdrawals were not considered in the study.

Most patients were treated and released quickly, but roughly 117,000 patients per year required hospitalization for adverse drug events. Many of those cases stemmed from drugs that require monitoring to avoid toxic build-up, including:
  • Insulin
  • Painkillers containing opioids
  • Anticlotting drugs
  • Amoxicillin
  • Antihistamines and cold remedies

In those 65 and older, ER visits were also linked to:

  • Coumadin, which helps prevent blood clots
  • Digoxin, which helps weak hearts work more efficiently

Journal of the American Medical Association October 18, 2006; 296(15): 1858-1866
Yahoo News October 17, 2006
WebMD October 17, 2006

Health Begins In The Colon

Health Begins In The Colon

$19.99
[ learn more ]

Add to Cart

The REAL Secret to Health is Finally Revealed! Did you know that disease starts and health begins in the colon? You can read more about how to better your health in Dr. Group's exclusive book